We’re currently upgrading our membership platform to bring you an improved experience. During this transition, access to member accounts is temporarily unavailable. We appreciate your patience and can’t wait to share the new and improved system with you soon!
For urgent membership questions, please contact info@clpsychiatry.org.
Journal Article Annotations
2025, 1st Quarter
Annotations by John A R Grimaldi MD, Mary Ann Cohen MD, FAPM, Kelly Cozza MD, DFAPA, FACLP and Luis Pereira MD
March, 2025
Of interest:
Advances in assessment and cognitive neurorehabilitation of HIV-related neurocognitive impairment.
Findings:
Using nationwide Medicaid claims data from 2001-2012, this population-based, retrospective study compared prevalence rates of retention in HIV care of persons with HIV (PWH) and schizophrenia with a control group of PWH without a diagnosis of schizophrenia or other major psychiatric disorder. Key findings included significantly lower prevalence of retention in care among PWH and schizophrenia compared to controls, 29.9% vs 38.5%, respectively. In subgroup analysis of demographic characteristics, men were less likely than women with HIV and schizophrenia to be retained in care, and White PWH and schizophrenia had lower retention rates compared to Blacks and Hispanics. In stratified analysis by substance use disorders, lower retention remained significantly more prevalent in PHW and schizophrenia compared to controls among those with alcohol, psychostimulant, sedative-hypnotic, and cannabis use disorders. Opioid use disorder was not associated with poorer retention in care. The association between medical comorbidities and lower retention varied by condition, Diabetes and hypertension were associated with lower rates of retention while dyslipidemia, hepatitis C, and other sexually transmitted infections conferred a greater likelihood of retention in care in PHW and schizophrenia, compared to controls. There was an overall decrease in disparity in retention in PWH with schizophrenia, compared to controls, over time.
Strengths and limitations:
This study’s strengths comprised its population-based sample of PWH, large size, nationwide scope, its use of both primary and secondary outcome measures, and several definitions of retention in care including CDC and US Health Resources and Services Administration definitions. The study was limited by lack of laboratory results, namely viral suppression, which is the gold standard for HIV quality of care. The data used was pooled from 45 states, and given the between-state heterogeneity observed, may not generalize to all states. Results may also not apply to other countries. The use of Medicaid data, and its delay in availability, may result in age of research findings. The introduction of the Affordable Care Act, after the study period, does not make it possible to assess the impact of this major national healthcare policy on HIV quality of care. Participants dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid, which may represent a more medically and psychiatrically ill cohort, were excluded from involvement in the study. Thus, this study may underestimate the disparity in magnitude of association between schizophrenia and retention in HIV care.
Relevance:
Serious mental illness, such as schizophrenia is a risk factor for HIV, and the prevalence of schizophrenia in PWH exceeds that found in the general population. Schizophrenia alone is associated with higher morbidity and mortality and lower HIV testing rates, and confers an additional risk of early mortality in PWH and schizophrenia. Despite these known disparities along the full HIV continuum of HIV, there are only a limited number of studies examining retention in care among PWH with and without schizophrenia. This is the first nationally representative US study to assess the impact of schizophrenia on retention in HIV care. Study findings provide evidence for the utility of integration of care for patients “triply diagnosed” with HIV, major mental illness, and substance use disorders. Future research is needed to evaluate the effects of integrated care on treatment outcomes and retention in not only PWH, but also the “triply diagnosed” subpopulation.
This narrative review of current knowledge of assessment and treatment of neurocognitive impairment in people with HIV (PWH) emphasizes the need for a multi-disciplinary approach to patients. The high prevalence of psychiatric and substance use disorders, the growing proportion of older PWH and attendant neurodegenerative and comorbid medical conditions, and persistently large percentage of PWH with neurocognitive impairment, despite good virologic control, call for an updated and more comprehensive diagnostic framework and targeted treatment interventions. Given the poor sensitivity of commonly used screening instruments such as the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Mini-mental Status Exam (MMSE) for identifying PWH with mild neurocognitive impairment (NCI), the authors suggest the use of a short screening questionnaire developed by Simioni, supplemented with neuropsychological testing. Neurocognitive impairments should be interpreted in relation to their effect on everyday functioning, which can be assessed with patient-reported outcome measures such as Lawton’s Instrumental Activities of Daily Living or the Medical Outcomes Survey-HIV. Pharmacologic options for addressing HIV-associated brain injury (HABI) are limited. Results of studies comparing the effect of high and low CNS-penetrating antiretroviral therapies on neurocognitive impairment have been mixed. Evidence is not strong enough to recommend adjunctive therapies such as psychostimulants, or neuroprotective or anti-inflammatory agents such as lithium or memantine. However, some agents, such as baricitinib, a kinase ½ inhibitor, have shown promise in preclinical studies using a mouse model. Among adjunctive treatment options, in one study, modafinil demonstrated improvement in global cognitive score, fatigue, and subjective cognitive functioning. There is more promising support for compensatory neuropsychological rehabilitation, computerized cognitive training (CCT), and gamified cognitive rehabilitation in PWH and NCI. Two randomized controlled trials of CCT found improvement in working memory and sustained attention that was maintained several months following completion of training. Although some studies suggest that conventional video games may improve working memory and verbal learning, gamified interventions designed specifically for cognitive training demonstrated the potential for improving functioning across a broader range of neuropsychological domains. Future research and large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to address this gap in therapeutic options for achieving and maintaining optimum brain health in PWH.