We’re currently upgrading our membership platform to bring you an improved experience. During this transition, access to member accounts is temporarily unavailable. We appreciate your patience and can’t wait to share the new and improved system with you soon!
For urgent membership questions, please contact info@clpsychiatry.org.
Journal Article Annotations
2025, 1st Quarter
Annotations by Mary Burke, MD
March, 2025
Of interest:
Climate change effects on the human gut microbiome: complex mechanisms and global inequities.
The finding:
Elderly patients with Alzheimer Disease (AD) related dementias are at risk for increased morbidity and mortality due to air pollution. This finding was especially noticeable in Black men.
Previous studies have shown negative health effects due to interactions between heat waves and PM2.5, fine particulate pollution linked to inflammation and neuroinflammation. Common sense health education on reducing PM 2.5 exposure (HEPA filters indoors, N 95 masks outside) may reduce repeated hospitalizations for those with dementias.
Strengths & weaknesses:
The authors note the originality of their work, linking air pollution to morbidity and mortality in vulnerable, elderly individuals. Their cohort is extremely large, strengthening their conclusions. However, they were not able to adjust for individual-level risk-factors and co-morbidities. Their data was based on Medicare administrative data, which has the potential for misclassification as well as underdiagnosis of dementias.
Relevance:
While there is no data yet to support clinical action regarding this study, it adds to the growing body of evidence that dementias, and particularly AD, are impacted by worsening environmental conditions.
The finding:
Mental health clinicians are increasingly being called on to address “Climate anxiety” or “eco-anxiety.” This study is a timely caution that, in order to achieve scientific validity, the field should standardize its approach to the many manifestations of anxious or depressive reactions to accelerating environmental deterioration.
Strengths and weaknesses:
Out of an original 18,209 records, the authors identified 12 different scales to measure climate/ environmental distress, illustrating that studies of this popular concept require more rigor. The phenomenon, while not pathological, is increasingly being reported. The authors state their goal of systematically operationalizing scales to understand this growing unease. The more profound impacts of climate change, such as PTSD, stresses related to displacement, as well as medical and neuropsychiatric sequelae, may outpace the varieties of eco-anxiety, illustrating that as a field our skills may be lagging behind clinical need.
Relevance:
As the article highlights, even individuals not directly impacted yet by climate change are experiencing uncomfortable mental health symptoms and may seek care. Clinicians can be alert for these manifestations of distress and approach methodically.
The finding:
This article provides an overview of the known and potential impacts of global climate change on the microbiome via at least four biological pathways: decreased food availability, alterations in nutrient content, introduction/ alteration of gut pathogens, and direct heat effects on the gut. Psychiatric research is increasingly understanding the interaction between the microbiome and mental health. As clinicians, a holistic understanding of our patients can improve our ability to counsel them on self-care, and advocate for environmental policies that protect their health.