Journal Article Annotations
2024, 3rd Quarter
Annotations by Lauren Fields, MD and Elizabeth Prince, DO
October, 2024
The finding:
This observational, cross-sectional study screened a clinic-based sample of children with sickle cell disease (SCD) ages 7-11 and found that 26.2% of patients had elevated scores on screening for inattentive symptoms of ADHD. Subsequent diagnostic assessment of those participants who screened positive found an overall prevalence rate of 13.1% for ADHD inattentive- and combined-type (ADHD-I/C), or 15.9% including patients with a preexisting diagnosis based on chart review. Neither inattentive symptoms nor ADHD-I/C diagnoses were significantly associated with unmet social needs or common medical factors, however exploratory analysis identified a correlation with indices of chronic inflammation.
Strength and weaknesses:
Regarding the strengths of this study, rather than relying solely on screening and rating scales, the follow-up evaluations for participants in the study utilized more extensive diagnostic tools. Additional strengths include the consideration of socio-environmental and other medical factors that might be associated with neurodevelopmental outcomes. Limitations include that this was a single-site screening study, and therefore the findings may not be generalizable to other populations. Additionally, the use of inattentive symptoms for screening did not capture patients with only hyperactive symptoms of ADHD.
Relevance:
The prevalence of psychiatric diagnoses is not well characterized among individuals with SCD, and most studies rely primarily on screening tools. This study provides estimated prevalence rates of ADHD-I/C among children at a single site using more extensive diagnostic tools and provides a model for further evaluations of the prevalence of psychiatric conditions in individuals with SCD with the incorporation of socio-economic and other medical factors.
The finding:
Twenty-five adult participants were assessed using five daily ecological momentary assessments of affect, pain, and prescription opioid use as well as daily sleep diaries. Findings showed an inverse association between daily positive affect and same-day average and maximum pain and an association between higher daily negative affect and same-day average and maximum pain when controlling for quality of sleep. Days with increased nocturnal awakenings were associated with subsequent days of higher average pain. The frequency of nocturnal awakenings moderated the effect of positive affect on daily average pain, as well as the effect of both positive and negative affect on maximum daily pain.
Strength and weaknesses:
Strengths include a clear and replicable study design and the use of assessments via smartphone to facilitate the potential scalability of the study. Limitations include small sample size, reliance on participant self-report, and that individuals with more severe psychiatric illness and those with more severe sickle cell disease (SCD) were excluded from participation.
Relevance:
This study emphasizes the importance of understanding the multifactorial nature of pain phenomena in SCD. Assessing and targeting factors that are associated with worsened pain, such as sleep quality and affect, may help to improve the quality of life for patients with SCD.
The finding:
Twenty-two adults with sickle cell disease (SCD) and their sibling donors in a nonmyeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) protocol completed baseline and 12-month post-transplant cognitive testing. Patients with SCD had slower processing speed than siblings. Post-transplant, processing speeds improved more for patients than siblings.
Strength and weaknesses:
Matched testing with sibling donors is an elegant study design, but the sample size was small and may not be generalizable to all adults with SCD. There were likely practice effects that explain improvements in subsequent testing, limiting interpretations of observed improvements.
Relevance:
CL psychiatrists should be aware of the risk of cognitive deficits in adults with SCD as this may impact overall functioning, including engagement in the health care system. Furthermore, as more patients are exposed to transformative therapies, like HSCT and gene therapy, it is reassuring that HSCT does not appear to worsen cognitive functioning.