Journal Article Annotations
2024, 2nd Quarter
Annotations by Samuel Kohrman, MD
July, 2024
The finding:
In critically ill adults in the intensive care unit (ICU), who screened positive for delirium via the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM ICU) or Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC), the scheduled administration of antipsychotics (haloperidol in 5mg doses to a maximum of 15-30mg daily, quetiapine to a maximum of 200-300mg daily, and ziprasidone ranging from 5mg to 40mg total daily dose) as compared to standard treatment or placebo, resulted in no difference in delirium or coma free days, in mortality at 28 days, in duration of mechanical ventilation, or in ICU or hospital length of stay. Such administration did not result in increased risk of adverse events as compared to standard treatment or placebo. Findings were determined to have moderate levels of certainty.
Strength and weaknesses:
Strengths for this systematic review and meta-analysis include a methodologically rigorous process with a large sample size for this population (1750 patients across 5 studies), a range of antipsychotic treatments (haloperidol, quetiapine and ziprasidone), and a mix of hyperactive (33%) and hypoactive (67%) delirium. Limitations include narrower scope of patients to the ICU setting, and inability to discern via subgroup analysis a difference between hyperactive and hypoactive delirium. Longer term risk evaluation was not available.
Relevance:
These findings, which look at antipsychotics exclusively as a treatment modality for delirium, suggest that in a population of critically ill adult patients in the ICU who screen positive for delirium via the CAM ICU or ICDSC, based on the study metrics, the scheduled antipsychotic dosing as detailed above does not statistically lend to more acute harm than not or to more acute benefit than not. It does not account for decrease in delirium intensity, symptomatic relief, patient comfort, ease of care provision. Similarly, it doesn’t account for risk of mortality beyond 28 days or for other longer-term risks. Decisions to use antipsychotics in this population, as per this paper, remain based on clinical judgement in each individual case.
The finding:
On retrospective medical record analysis at a large academic medical center, out of a sample of 106 identified inpatients between 2017 and 2022 with both an Electroencephalogram (EEG) and a scored Bush Francis Catatonia Exam (BFCE) completed within 24 hours of one another, five patients were found to have generalized periodic discharges on EEG. All five had clinical exams consistent with both catatonia and delirium. In this retrospective case series, four of five were treated with benzodiazepines and all four showed an improvement in BFCE (14 to 7; 24 to 19; 16 to 7; 21 to 15) on repeat exams after initiation of scheduled lorazepam (1mg q 6hours; 2mg q 6 hours; 0.25mg q 6 hours; 2mg q 4 hours).
Strength and weaknesses:
Strengths include introducing a novel finding in the literature, of the potential association of catatonia and generalized periodic discharges in the setting of delirium. Limitations include observational study design with lower evidence strength (retrospective case series), lack of follow-up EEG for some of the cases, and lack of clarity on if benzodiazepines were administered orally or parenterally in each case.
Relevance:
Catatonia and delirium do overlap in the general hospital and inpatient psychiatric settings; currently, catatonia, under DSM-5-TR criteria, cannot be diagnosed in the presence of delirium. This case series highlights the possible association of catatonia with general periodic discharges on EEG. This series suggests that empiric benzodiazepine treatment may clinically benefit patients with comorbid catatonia and generalized periodic discharges in the setting of delirium. Further investigation is warranted.