Journal Article Annotations
2021, 2nd Quarter
Annotations by Liliya Gershengoren MD
April, 2021
The finding:
In an analysis of 423,060 critical illness survivors, the crude incidence (per 100 000 person years) of suicide, self-harm, and the composite of suicide or self-harm among ICU survivors was 41.4, 327.9, and 361.0, respectively. Patients with an ICU admissions were at an increased risk of suicide and self-harm as compared with patients who were did not require an ICU admission during their hospitalization. Prior mental health diagnoses such as depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, schizophrenia and bipolar disorder were associated with suicide or self-harm. Furthermore, patients requiring mechanical ventilation or renal replacement therapy in the ICU were also at an increased risk of suicide or self-harm.
Strength and weaknesses:
A strength of the study is its inclusion of an entire consecutive patient series, ensuring a large cohort of patients, minimal missing data, and lower risk of bias. While the study demonstrated an important inverse association between suicide and socioeconomic status, it did not describe the racial and ethnic background of the patients in reference to suicide and self-harm findings. Considerations of social determinants of health were not included in the study making its data less generalizable in light of issues such as diversity, equity and inclusion in medical and mental healthcare and potential outcomes.
Relevance:
Critically ill patients are a potentially vulnerable patient population and are often evaluated by C-L psychiatrists during their hospitalization. While the reasons for a psychiatric consult may vary, the consultant should keep in mind not only acute psychiatric morbidity in the ICU survivors but also the potential for ongoing psychic distress beyond the critical period of the medical illness. Increased risk of suicide and self-harm during and after hospitalization complicates patients’ prognosis and alters treatment planning for the C-L Psychiatrist.
Type of study (EBM guide):
Case control study
The finding:
This longitudinal study of 93 women found that pain during pregnancy predicted postpartum depression irrespective of a history of antenatal depression. Specifically, increases in pain over the course of pregnancy and lasting into the post-partum period was associated with increased risk of postpartum depression.
Strength and weaknesses:
A significant limitation of the study was the lack of racial and ethnic diversity among its participants. Majority of the participants in the study were white “of those mothers who reported race and ethnicity, 89% were White, 8% Asian, 1% American Indian, 1% African American, and 1% mixed race. Most mothers were also non-Hispanic (96%).” As a result, generalizability of the study results is limited. A key strength of the study is its emphasis on maternal pain trajectories over the 2nd and 3rd trimesters as well as the postpartum period. The study explores the dynamic changes in pain and its implications on maternal mental health.
Relevance:
The relationship between pain and mental health is familiar to any C-L psychiatrist. Patients struggling with pain during pregnancy require closer monitoring during the postpartum period for depression.
Type of study (EBM guide):
Cohort study