Journal Article Annotations
2018, 2nd Quarter
Annotations by Maalobeeka Gangopadhyay, MD; and Lex Denysenko, MD, FACLP
July 2018
Type of study: Randomized controlled trial
The finding: Melatonin 3mg at 9pm did not significantly decrease delirium incidence in any of the four analyses used, although none of the analyses reached statistical significance. Melatonin also did it significantly improve sleep duration. Sleep fragmentation was associated with delirium.
Strength and weaknesses: This is a randomized controlled trial, but it did not achieve power to determine an effect for melatonin on delirium prevention. The study used a 3mg dose and at a 9pm interval with in-tent that it would improve sleep quality, and this may have influenced outcomes. Rather than using a gold-standard delirium assessment such as the Delirium Rating Scale, the study relied on CAM screening at bedside without inter-rater reliability assessed. Actigraphy but not gold-standard polysomnography was used.
Relevance: Delirium prevention should be in the purview of all inpatient consultation-liaison psychiatrists, and the use of melatonin for delirium prevention has gained much attention in recent years. This study suggests further studies are needed to determine the best dose nd timing of mela-tonin for delirium prevention.
Opinion: Melatonin agonists have been shown to have improvement in delirium prevention in three prior studies. The mechanism is likely not related to improving sleep, but may be related to improving circadian rhythm, modulating neurotransmitter function, attenuating inflammatory signaling molecules (cytokines, adiponectin), or antioxidant effects. Melatonin begins to increase in normal individuals after 6pm, but in elderly patients, nightly endogenous melatonin increases tend to occur later in the night. Thus, administration of melatonin at non-sedating doses (less than 3mg, and perhaps as low as 0.5) and at 6pm rather than bedtime, may be key to effectiveness of melatonin in delirium prevention, although further studies are needed.
Type of study: Randomized controlled trial
The finding: Subjects who received nocturnal low-dose dexmedetomidine were less likely to develop delirium. Dexmedetomidine subjects required less fentanyl for sedation, optimal sedation was more readily achieved in the dexmedetomidine group, and patients reported feeling less tired during the daytime (although sleep quality did not differ). Midazolam infusion rates did not differ between the two groups.
Strength and weaknesses: This is a well-designed multi-center randomized controlled trial. The trial was of 3-year duration, during which time other implemented delirium-prevention implantation strategies may have influenced results. 26% enrollment of eligible patients may have compromised external validity. A gold standard for assessment of delirium severity was not used (screening tool only). Polysomnography was not used to assess sleep quality. Patients were not followed after leaving ICU in terms of delirium incidence.
Relevance: This is the first RCT showing reduced incidence of delirium using dexmedetomidine. The acquisition cost of using low dose nocturnal dexmedetomidine compared to potentially higher dosing of dexmedetomidine round-the-clock may be of interest from a cost perspective. A possible opioid-sparing effect of dexmedetomidine due to improved analgesia rather than its effect on sedation warrants further study.