Authors: Juliana Zambrano, MD, et al.
Abstract: Research into racial and ethnic disparities in Psychiatry has hitherto focused on the availability and utilization of mental health services; care in emergency departments; and inpatient psychiatric services. Little is known about disparities in care within general hospital C-L Psychiatry services.
In this study, the authors conducted a retrospective chart review using electronic health record data of all adults (≥ 18 years) admitted to inpatient medical or surgical floors at Massachusetts General Hospital for whom a psychiatric consultation was requested from March 1 to April 30, 2021.
They examined differences by race and ethnicity in the rates of consultation requests; psychiatric diagnoses made by both primary teams and the psychiatric consultants; use of legal holds or restraints; use of psychotropic medications; follow-up by the C-L Psychiatry service; and ultimate disposition.
The service received 310 unique consults during the study period. Compared to hospital-wide numbers, Black-identifying patients were over-represented in the sample (11.9% vs 6.6%), while Latinx patients were underrepresented (6.1% vs 9.8%).
For Black-identifying patients, there were higher odds of being placed on a legal hold both prior to, and after, the consult question; and in having a one-to-one observer prior to, and after, the initial consult visit. But there were no other measurable differences in care or outcomes by racial or ethnic categories.
“Black-identifying patients may be more likely to receive psychiatric consultation and be placed on legal holds because of a combination of chronic adverse social determinants of health and race-based bias,” conclude the authors. “Conversely, Latinx patients may be less likely to receive psychiatric consultation because of language barriers, among other factors.”
They add: “The lack of disparities identified in other domains may be encouraging, but larger studies are needed. Further research is also needed to identify causality and interventions that could help close the gap in care and outcomes for racial and ethnic minorities.”
Importance: A growing body of research describes how exposure to adverse social determinants of health drives poor health outcomes. In the US, people of color have repeatedly endured health inequities, including increased morbidity and mortality, and decreased access and quality of care. And over the past several years, there has been an increasing recognition of and focus on individual, institutional, and systemic racism and its impacts on health disparities.
At a clinical level, implicit racial and ethnic bias has been shown to be prevalent among health care professionals and has been related to differing provider-patient interactions, acute care, diagnostic and treatment decisions, chronic disease management, and ultimate health outcomes. Many institutional guidelines, health care delivery, and broader national policies and practices have also been historically racist and thought to be causal of health disparities.
As the authors say, multidisciplinary services such as C-L Psychiatry may be particularly important to characterize as they exemplify an interplay of many factors in patient and team encounters. Chronic socioeconomic disparities, our medical and surgical colleagues’ clinical judgment and care, and the psychiatrist’s ability to gather information and make independent decisions, blend with each other—and with all clinicians’ unconscious attitudes.
Availability: Pre-publication in General Hospital Psychiatry.
